Time difference between Poços de Caldas and Beijing

Beijing is 11 hours ahead of Poços de Caldas.

America/Sao_Paulo Asia/Shanghai already the next day

Local time in both cities

18:18
Monday, 21 September 2026
America/Sao_Paulo · UTC-03:00
Beijing · China
05:18
Tuesday, 22 September 2026
Asia/Shanghai · UTC+08:00

Beijing is 11 hours ahead of Poços de Caldas.

already the next day

Time zones

Poços de CaldasAmerica/Sao_Paulo · UTC-03:00
BeijingAsia/Shanghai · UTC+08:00

Poços de Caldas does not observe daylight saving and stays on UTC-03:00 all year.

Beijing does not observe daylight saving and stays on UTC+08:00 all year.

Hour-by-hour conversion

Calculated for 2026-09-21 local time in Poços de Caldas. The two places start and end daylight saving on different dates, so another day can give a different result.

Poços de Caldas (source) Beijing (target)
00:00 11:00
01:00 12:00
02:00 13:00
03:00 14:00
04:00 15:00
05:00 16:00
06:00 17:00
07:00 18:00
08:00 19:00
09:00 20:00
10:00 21:00
11:00 22:00
12:00 23:00
13:00 00:00 next day
14:00 01:00 next day
15:00 02:00 next day
16:00 03:00 next day
17:00 04:00 next day
18:00 05:00 next day
19:00 06:00 next day
20:00 07:00 next day
21:00 08:00 next day
22:00 09:00 next day
23:00 10:00 next day

FAQ

How many hours apart are Poços de Caldas and Beijing right now?
The answer at the top of the page is calculated for the current moment and states which side is ahead. The gap changes during the year, because the two places usually start and end daylight saving on different dates.
Is this difference the same all year?
Not necessarily. Poços de Caldas uses America/Sao_Paulo and Beijing uses Asia/Shanghai; if either observes daylight saving, the gap shifts during the year. Use “Convert a specific date and time” below to calculate it for a given day.
How do I read the conversion table?
The left column lists each whole hour in Poços de Caldas; the right column is the local time in Beijing at that same instant, with date rollovers marked. On the day clocks jump forward, some hours do not exist locally — the table says so instead of showing a plausible but wrong value.

Both cities