Time difference between Beijing and Kiryat Ono
Kiryat Ono is 5 hours behind Beijing.
Local time in both cities
Beijing · China
02:28
Kiryat Ono · Israel
21:28
Kiryat Ono is 5 hours behind Beijing.
still the previous day
Time zones
| Beijing | Asia/Shanghai · UTC+08:00 |
|---|---|
| Kiryat Ono | Asia/Jerusalem · UTC+03:00 |
Beijing does not observe daylight saving and stays on UTC+08:00 all year.
Kiryat Ono is currently on daylight saving time (UTC+03:00). Next change: 2026-10-25 01:00.
Hour-by-hour conversion
Calculated for 2026-09-22 local time in Beijing. The two places start and end daylight saving on different dates, so another day can give a different result.
| Beijing (source) | Kiryat Ono (target) |
|---|---|
| 00:00 | 19:00 prev day |
| 01:00 | 20:00 prev day |
| 02:00 | 21:00 prev day |
| 03:00 | 22:00 prev day |
| 04:00 | 23:00 prev day |
| 05:00 | 00:00 |
| 06:00 | 01:00 |
| 07:00 | 02:00 |
| 08:00 | 03:00 |
| 09:00 | 04:00 |
| 10:00 | 05:00 |
| 11:00 | 06:00 |
| 12:00 | 07:00 |
| 13:00 | 08:00 |
| 14:00 | 09:00 |
| 15:00 | 10:00 |
| 16:00 | 11:00 |
| 17:00 | 12:00 |
| 18:00 | 13:00 |
| 19:00 | 14:00 |
| 20:00 | 15:00 |
| 21:00 | 16:00 |
| 22:00 | 17:00 |
| 23:00 | 18:00 |
Other common differences from Beijing
FAQ
- How many hours apart are Beijing and Kiryat Ono right now?
- The answer at the top of the page is calculated for the current moment and states which side is ahead. The gap changes during the year, because the two places usually start and end daylight saving on different dates.
- Is this difference the same all year?
- Not necessarily. Beijing uses Asia/Shanghai and Kiryat Ono uses Asia/Jerusalem; if either observes daylight saving, the gap shifts during the year. Use “Convert a specific date and time” below to calculate it for a given day.
- How do I read the conversion table?
- The left column lists each whole hour in Beijing; the right column is the local time in Kiryat Ono at that same instant, with date rollovers marked. On the day clocks jump forward, some hours do not exist locally — the table says so instead of showing a plausible but wrong value.