Time difference between Shanghai and Bab Ezzouar
Bab Ezzouar is 7 hours behind Shanghai.
Local time in both cities
Shanghai · China
01:44
Bab Ezzouar · Algeria
18:44
Bab Ezzouar is 7 hours behind Shanghai.
still the previous day
Time zones
| Shanghai | Asia/Shanghai · UTC+08:00 |
|---|---|
| Bab Ezzouar | Africa/Algiers · UTC+01:00 |
Shanghai does not observe daylight saving and stays on UTC+08:00 all year.
Bab Ezzouar does not observe daylight saving and stays on UTC+01:00 all year.
Hour-by-hour conversion
Calculated for 2026-09-22 local time in Shanghai. The two places start and end daylight saving on different dates, so another day can give a different result.
| Shanghai (source) | Bab Ezzouar (target) |
|---|---|
| 00:00 | 17:00 prev day |
| 01:00 | 18:00 prev day |
| 02:00 | 19:00 prev day |
| 03:00 | 20:00 prev day |
| 04:00 | 21:00 prev day |
| 05:00 | 22:00 prev day |
| 06:00 | 23:00 prev day |
| 07:00 | 00:00 |
| 08:00 | 01:00 |
| 09:00 | 02:00 |
| 10:00 | 03:00 |
| 11:00 | 04:00 |
| 12:00 | 05:00 |
| 13:00 | 06:00 |
| 14:00 | 07:00 |
| 15:00 | 08:00 |
| 16:00 | 09:00 |
| 17:00 | 10:00 |
| 18:00 | 11:00 |
| 19:00 | 12:00 |
| 20:00 | 13:00 |
| 21:00 | 14:00 |
| 22:00 | 15:00 |
| 23:00 | 16:00 |
Other common differences from Shanghai
FAQ
- How many hours apart are Shanghai and Bab Ezzouar right now?
- The answer at the top of the page is calculated for the current moment and states which side is ahead. The gap changes during the year, because the two places usually start and end daylight saving on different dates.
- Is this difference the same all year?
- Not necessarily. Shanghai uses Asia/Shanghai and Bab Ezzouar uses Africa/Algiers; if either observes daylight saving, the gap shifts during the year. Use “Convert a specific date and time” below to calculate it for a given day.
- How do I read the conversion table?
- The left column lists each whole hour in Shanghai; the right column is the local time in Bab Ezzouar at that same instant, with date rollovers marked. On the day clocks jump forward, some hours do not exist locally — the table says so instead of showing a plausible but wrong value.