Time difference between Rionegro and Shanghai

Shanghai is 13 hours ahead of Rionegro.

America/Bogota Asia/Shanghai already the next day

Local time in both cities

Rionegro · Colombia
15:41
Monday, 21 September 2026
America/Bogota · UTC-05:00
Shanghai · China
04:41
Tuesday, 22 September 2026
Asia/Shanghai · UTC+08:00

Shanghai is 13 hours ahead of Rionegro.

already the next day

Time zones

RionegroAmerica/Bogota · UTC-05:00
ShanghaiAsia/Shanghai · UTC+08:00

Rionegro does not observe daylight saving and stays on UTC-05:00 all year.

Shanghai does not observe daylight saving and stays on UTC+08:00 all year.

Hour-by-hour conversion

Calculated for 2026-09-21 local time in Rionegro. The two places start and end daylight saving on different dates, so another day can give a different result.

Rionegro (source) Shanghai (target)
00:00 13:00
01:00 14:00
02:00 15:00
03:00 16:00
04:00 17:00
05:00 18:00
06:00 19:00
07:00 20:00
08:00 21:00
09:00 22:00
10:00 23:00
11:00 00:00 next day
12:00 01:00 next day
13:00 02:00 next day
14:00 03:00 next day
15:00 04:00 next day
16:00 05:00 next day
17:00 06:00 next day
18:00 07:00 next day
19:00 08:00 next day
20:00 09:00 next day
21:00 10:00 next day
22:00 11:00 next day
23:00 12:00 next day

FAQ

How many hours apart are Rionegro and Shanghai right now?
The answer at the top of the page is calculated for the current moment and states which side is ahead. The gap changes during the year, because the two places usually start and end daylight saving on different dates.
Is this difference the same all year?
Not necessarily. Rionegro uses America/Bogota and Shanghai uses Asia/Shanghai; if either observes daylight saving, the gap shifts during the year. Use “Convert a specific date and time” below to calculate it for a given day.
How do I read the conversion table?
The left column lists each whole hour in Rionegro; the right column is the local time in Shanghai at that same instant, with date rollovers marked. On the day clocks jump forward, some hours do not exist locally — the table says so instead of showing a plausible but wrong value.

Both cities