Time difference between Hatogaya-honchō and Beijing
Beijing is 1 hours behind Hatogaya-honchō.
Local time in both cities
Hatogaya-honchō · Japan
21:51
Beijing · China
20:51
Beijing is 1 hours behind Hatogaya-honchō.
same day
Time zones
| Hatogaya-honchō | Asia/Tokyo · UTC+09:00 |
|---|---|
| Beijing | Asia/Shanghai · UTC+08:00 |
Hatogaya-honchō does not observe daylight saving and stays on UTC+09:00 all year.
Beijing does not observe daylight saving and stays on UTC+08:00 all year.
Hour-by-hour conversion
Calculated for 2026-09-21 local time in Hatogaya-honchō. The two places start and end daylight saving on different dates, so another day can give a different result.
| Hatogaya-honchō (source) | Beijing (target) |
|---|---|
| 00:00 | 23:00 prev day |
| 01:00 | 00:00 |
| 02:00 | 01:00 |
| 03:00 | 02:00 |
| 04:00 | 03:00 |
| 05:00 | 04:00 |
| 06:00 | 05:00 |
| 07:00 | 06:00 |
| 08:00 | 07:00 |
| 09:00 | 08:00 |
| 10:00 | 09:00 |
| 11:00 | 10:00 |
| 12:00 | 11:00 |
| 13:00 | 12:00 |
| 14:00 | 13:00 |
| 15:00 | 14:00 |
| 16:00 | 15:00 |
| 17:00 | 16:00 |
| 18:00 | 17:00 |
| 19:00 | 18:00 |
| 20:00 | 19:00 |
| 21:00 | 20:00 |
| 22:00 | 21:00 |
| 23:00 | 22:00 |
Other common differences from Hatogaya-honchō
FAQ
- How many hours apart are Hatogaya-honchō and Beijing right now?
- The answer at the top of the page is calculated for the current moment and states which side is ahead. The gap changes during the year, because the two places usually start and end daylight saving on different dates.
- Is this difference the same all year?
- Not necessarily. Hatogaya-honchō uses Asia/Tokyo and Beijing uses Asia/Shanghai; if either observes daylight saving, the gap shifts during the year. Use “Convert a specific date and time” below to calculate it for a given day.
- How do I read the conversion table?
- The left column lists each whole hour in Hatogaya-honchō; the right column is the local time in Beijing at that same instant, with date rollovers marked. On the day clocks jump forward, some hours do not exist locally — the table says so instead of showing a plausible but wrong value.