Time difference between Los Reyes Acaquilpan and Chicago

Chicago is 1 hours ahead of Los Reyes Acaquilpan.

America/Mexico_City America/Chicago same day

Local time in both cities

20:51
Sunday, 20 September 2026
America/Mexico_City · UTC-06:00
Chicago · United States
21:51
Sunday, 20 September 2026
America/Chicago · UTC-05:00

Chicago is 1 hours ahead of Los Reyes Acaquilpan.

same day

Time zones

Los Reyes AcaquilpanAmerica/Mexico_City · UTC-06:00
ChicagoAmerica/Chicago · UTC-05:00

Los Reyes Acaquilpan does not observe daylight saving and stays on UTC-06:00 all year.

Chicago is currently on daylight saving time (UTC-05:00). Next change: 2026-11-01 01:00.

Hour-by-hour conversion

Calculated for 2026-09-20 local time in Los Reyes Acaquilpan. The two places start and end daylight saving on different dates, so another day can give a different result.

Los Reyes Acaquilpan (source) Chicago (target)
00:00 01:00
01:00 02:00
02:00 03:00
03:00 04:00
04:00 05:00
05:00 06:00
06:00 07:00
07:00 08:00
08:00 09:00
09:00 10:00
10:00 11:00
11:00 12:00
12:00 13:00
13:00 14:00
14:00 15:00
15:00 16:00
16:00 17:00
17:00 18:00
18:00 19:00
19:00 20:00
20:00 21:00
21:00 22:00
22:00 23:00
23:00 00:00 next day

FAQ

How many hours apart are Los Reyes Acaquilpan and Chicago right now?
The answer at the top of the page is calculated for the current moment and states which side is ahead. The gap changes during the year, because the two places usually start and end daylight saving on different dates.
Is this difference the same all year?
Not necessarily. Los Reyes Acaquilpan uses America/Mexico_City and Chicago uses America/Chicago; if either observes daylight saving, the gap shifts during the year. Use “Convert a specific date and time” below to calculate it for a given day.
How do I read the conversion table?
The left column lists each whole hour in Los Reyes Acaquilpan; the right column is the local time in Chicago at that same instant, with date rollovers marked. On the day clocks jump forward, some hours do not exist locally — the table says so instead of showing a plausible but wrong value.

Both cities