Time difference between Phasi Charoen and Hong Kong
Hong Kong is 1 hours ahead of Phasi Charoen.
Local time in both cities
Phasi Charoen · Thailand
16:23
Hong Kong · China
17:23
Hong Kong is 1 hours ahead of Phasi Charoen.
same day
Time zones
| Phasi Charoen | Asia/Bangkok · UTC+07:00 |
|---|---|
| Hong Kong | Asia/Hong_Kong · UTC+08:00 |
Phasi Charoen does not observe daylight saving and stays on UTC+07:00 all year.
Hong Kong does not observe daylight saving and stays on UTC+08:00 all year.
Hour-by-hour conversion
Calculated for 2026-09-21 local time in Phasi Charoen. The two places start and end daylight saving on different dates, so another day can give a different result.
| Phasi Charoen (source) | Hong Kong (target) |
|---|---|
| 00:00 | 01:00 |
| 01:00 | 02:00 |
| 02:00 | 03:00 |
| 03:00 | 04:00 |
| 04:00 | 05:00 |
| 05:00 | 06:00 |
| 06:00 | 07:00 |
| 07:00 | 08:00 |
| 08:00 | 09:00 |
| 09:00 | 10:00 |
| 10:00 | 11:00 |
| 11:00 | 12:00 |
| 12:00 | 13:00 |
| 13:00 | 14:00 |
| 14:00 | 15:00 |
| 15:00 | 16:00 |
| 16:00 | 17:00 |
| 17:00 | 18:00 |
| 18:00 | 19:00 |
| 19:00 | 20:00 |
| 20:00 | 21:00 |
| 21:00 | 22:00 |
| 22:00 | 23:00 |
| 23:00 | 00:00 next day |
Other common differences from Phasi Charoen
FAQ
- How many hours apart are Phasi Charoen and Hong Kong right now?
- The answer at the top of the page is calculated for the current moment and states which side is ahead. The gap changes during the year, because the two places usually start and end daylight saving on different dates.
- Is this difference the same all year?
- Not necessarily. Phasi Charoen uses Asia/Bangkok and Hong Kong uses Asia/Hong_Kong; if either observes daylight saving, the gap shifts during the year. Use “Convert a specific date and time” below to calculate it for a given day.
- How do I read the conversion table?
- The left column lists each whole hour in Phasi Charoen; the right column is the local time in Hong Kong at that same instant, with date rollovers marked. On the day clocks jump forward, some hours do not exist locally — the table says so instead of showing a plausible but wrong value.