Time difference between Punākha and Denver
Denver is 12 hours behind Punākha.
Local time in both cities
Bhutan
United StatesDenver is 12 hours behind Punākha.
still the previous day
Time zones
| Punākha | Asia/Thimphu · UTC+06:00 |
|---|---|
| Denver | America/Denver · UTC-06:00 |
Punākha does not observe daylight saving and stays on UTC+06:00 all year.
Denver is currently on daylight saving time (UTC-06:00). Next change: 2026-11-01 01:00.
Hour-by-hour conversion
Calculated for 2026-09-22 local time in Punākha. The two places start and end daylight saving on different dates, so another day can give a different result.
| Punākha (source) | Denver (target) |
|---|---|
| 00:00 | 12:00 prev day |
| 01:00 | 13:00 prev day |
| 02:00 | 14:00 prev day |
| 03:00 | 15:00 prev day |
| 04:00 | 16:00 prev day |
| 05:00 | 17:00 prev day |
| 06:00 | 18:00 prev day |
| 07:00 | 19:00 prev day |
| 08:00 | 20:00 prev day |
| 09:00 | 21:00 prev day |
| 10:00 | 22:00 prev day |
| 11:00 | 23:00 prev day |
| 12:00 | 00:00 |
| 13:00 | 01:00 |
| 14:00 | 02:00 |
| 15:00 | 03:00 |
| 16:00 | 04:00 |
| 17:00 | 05:00 |
| 18:00 | 06:00 |
| 19:00 | 07:00 |
| 20:00 | 08:00 |
| 21:00 | 09:00 |
| 22:00 | 10:00 |
| 23:00 | 11:00 |
Other common differences from Punākha
FAQ
- How many hours apart are Punākha and Denver right now?
- The answer at the top of the page is calculated for the current moment and states which side is ahead. The gap changes during the year, because the two places usually start and end daylight saving on different dates.
- Is this difference the same all year?
- Not necessarily. Punākha uses Asia/Thimphu and Denver uses America/Denver; if either observes daylight saving, the gap shifts during the year. Use “Convert a specific date and time” below to calculate it for a given day.
- How do I read the conversion table?
- The left column lists each whole hour in Punākha; the right column is the local time in Denver at that same instant, with date rollovers marked. On the day clocks jump forward, some hours do not exist locally — the table says so instead of showing a plausible but wrong value.