Time difference between Rio Grande and Denver
Denver is 3 hours behind Rio Grande.
Local time in both cities
Rio Grande · Brazil
11:45
BrazilDenver · United States
08:45
United StatesDenver is 3 hours behind Rio Grande.
same day
Time zones
| Rio Grande | America/Sao_Paulo · UTC-03:00 |
|---|---|
| Denver | America/Denver · UTC-06:00 |
Rio Grande does not observe daylight saving and stays on UTC-03:00 all year.
Denver is currently on daylight saving time (UTC-06:00). Next change: 2026-11-01 01:00.
Hour-by-hour conversion
Calculated for 2026-09-21 local time in Rio Grande. The two places start and end daylight saving on different dates, so another day can give a different result.
| Rio Grande (source) | Denver (target) |
|---|---|
| 00:00 | 21:00 prev day |
| 01:00 | 22:00 prev day |
| 02:00 | 23:00 prev day |
| 03:00 | 00:00 |
| 04:00 | 01:00 |
| 05:00 | 02:00 |
| 06:00 | 03:00 |
| 07:00 | 04:00 |
| 08:00 | 05:00 |
| 09:00 | 06:00 |
| 10:00 | 07:00 |
| 11:00 | 08:00 |
| 12:00 | 09:00 |
| 13:00 | 10:00 |
| 14:00 | 11:00 |
| 15:00 | 12:00 |
| 16:00 | 13:00 |
| 17:00 | 14:00 |
| 18:00 | 15:00 |
| 19:00 | 16:00 |
| 20:00 | 17:00 |
| 21:00 | 18:00 |
| 22:00 | 19:00 |
| 23:00 | 20:00 |
Other common differences from Rio Grande
FAQ
- How many hours apart are Rio Grande and Denver right now?
- The answer at the top of the page is calculated for the current moment and states which side is ahead. The gap changes during the year, because the two places usually start and end daylight saving on different dates.
- Is this difference the same all year?
- Not necessarily. Rio Grande uses America/Sao_Paulo and Denver uses America/Denver; if either observes daylight saving, the gap shifts during the year. Use “Convert a specific date and time” below to calculate it for a given day.
- How do I read the conversion table?
- The left column lists each whole hour in Rio Grande; the right column is the local time in Denver at that same instant, with date rollovers marked. On the day clocks jump forward, some hours do not exist locally — the table says so instead of showing a plausible but wrong value.