Time difference between Shanghai and Ciudad Bolivia

Ciudad Bolivia is 12 hours behind Shanghai.

Asia/Shanghai America/Caracas same day

Local time in both cities

Shanghai · China
19:12
Monday, 21 September 2026
Asia/Shanghai · UTC+08:00
Ciudad Bolivia · Venezuela
07:12
Monday, 21 September 2026
America/Caracas · UTC-04:00

Ciudad Bolivia is 12 hours behind Shanghai.

same day

Time zones

ShanghaiAsia/Shanghai · UTC+08:00
Ciudad BoliviaAmerica/Caracas · UTC-04:00

Shanghai does not observe daylight saving and stays on UTC+08:00 all year.

Ciudad Bolivia does not observe daylight saving and stays on UTC-04:00 all year.

Hour-by-hour conversion

Calculated for 2026-09-21 local time in Shanghai. The two places start and end daylight saving on different dates, so another day can give a different result.

Shanghai (source) Ciudad Bolivia (target)
00:00 12:00 prev day
01:00 13:00 prev day
02:00 14:00 prev day
03:00 15:00 prev day
04:00 16:00 prev day
05:00 17:00 prev day
06:00 18:00 prev day
07:00 19:00 prev day
08:00 20:00 prev day
09:00 21:00 prev day
10:00 22:00 prev day
11:00 23:00 prev day
12:00 00:00
13:00 01:00
14:00 02:00
15:00 03:00
16:00 04:00
17:00 05:00
18:00 06:00
19:00 07:00
20:00 08:00
21:00 09:00
22:00 10:00
23:00 11:00

FAQ

How many hours apart are Shanghai and Ciudad Bolivia right now?
The answer at the top of the page is calculated for the current moment and states which side is ahead. The gap changes during the year, because the two places usually start and end daylight saving on different dates.
Is this difference the same all year?
Not necessarily. Shanghai uses Asia/Shanghai and Ciudad Bolivia uses America/Caracas; if either observes daylight saving, the gap shifts during the year. Use “Convert a specific date and time” below to calculate it for a given day.
How do I read the conversion table?
The left column lists each whole hour in Shanghai; the right column is the local time in Ciudad Bolivia at that same instant, with date rollovers marked. On the day clocks jump forward, some hours do not exist locally — the table says so instead of showing a plausible but wrong value.

Both cities