Time difference between Wolverhampton and Chicago

Chicago is 6 hours behind Wolverhampton.

Europe/London America/Chicago same day

Local time in both cities

Wolverhampton · United Kingdom
08:15
Monday, 21 September 2026
Europe/London · UTC+01:00
Chicago · United States
02:15
Monday, 21 September 2026
America/Chicago · UTC-05:00

Chicago is 6 hours behind Wolverhampton.

same day

Time zones

WolverhamptonEurope/London · UTC+01:00
ChicagoAmerica/Chicago · UTC-05:00

Wolverhampton is currently on daylight saving time (UTC+01:00). Next change: 2026-10-25 01:00.

Chicago is currently on daylight saving time (UTC-05:00). Next change: 2026-11-01 01:00.

Hour-by-hour conversion

Calculated for 2026-09-21 local time in Wolverhampton. The two places start and end daylight saving on different dates, so another day can give a different result.

Wolverhampton (source) Chicago (target)
00:00 18:00 prev day
01:00 19:00 prev day
02:00 20:00 prev day
03:00 21:00 prev day
04:00 22:00 prev day
05:00 23:00 prev day
06:00 00:00
07:00 01:00
08:00 02:00
09:00 03:00
10:00 04:00
11:00 05:00
12:00 06:00
13:00 07:00
14:00 08:00
15:00 09:00
16:00 10:00
17:00 11:00
18:00 12:00
19:00 13:00
20:00 14:00
21:00 15:00
22:00 16:00
23:00 17:00

FAQ

How many hours apart are Wolverhampton and Chicago right now?
The answer at the top of the page is calculated for the current moment and states which side is ahead. The gap changes during the year, because the two places usually start and end daylight saving on different dates.
Is this difference the same all year?
Not necessarily. Wolverhampton uses Europe/London and Chicago uses America/Chicago; if either observes daylight saving, the gap shifts during the year. Use “Convert a specific date and time” below to calculate it for a given day.
How do I read the conversion table?
The left column lists each whole hour in Wolverhampton; the right column is the local time in Chicago at that same instant, with date rollovers marked. On the day clocks jump forward, some hours do not exist locally — the table says so instead of showing a plausible but wrong value.

Both cities