Time difference between Alajuela and Tokyo
Tokyo is 15 hours ahead of Alajuela.
Local time in both cities
Tokyo is 15 hours ahead of Alajuela.
already the next day
Time zones
| Alajuela | America/Costa_Rica · UTC-06:00 |
|---|---|
| Tokyo | Asia/Tokyo · UTC+09:00 |
Alajuela does not observe daylight saving and stays on UTC-06:00 all year.
Tokyo does not observe daylight saving and stays on UTC+09:00 all year.
Hour-by-hour conversion
Calculated for 2026-09-20 local time in Alajuela. The two places start and end daylight saving on different dates, so another day can give a different result.
| Alajuela (source) | Tokyo (target) |
|---|---|
| 00:00 | 15:00 |
| 01:00 | 16:00 |
| 02:00 | 17:00 |
| 03:00 | 18:00 |
| 04:00 | 19:00 |
| 05:00 | 20:00 |
| 06:00 | 21:00 |
| 07:00 | 22:00 |
| 08:00 | 23:00 |
| 09:00 | 00:00 next day |
| 10:00 | 01:00 next day |
| 11:00 | 02:00 next day |
| 12:00 | 03:00 next day |
| 13:00 | 04:00 next day |
| 14:00 | 05:00 next day |
| 15:00 | 06:00 next day |
| 16:00 | 07:00 next day |
| 17:00 | 08:00 next day |
| 18:00 | 09:00 next day |
| 19:00 | 10:00 next day |
| 20:00 | 11:00 next day |
| 21:00 | 12:00 next day |
| 22:00 | 13:00 next day |
| 23:00 | 14:00 next day |
Other common differences from Alajuela
FAQ
- How many hours apart are Alajuela and Tokyo right now?
- The answer at the top of the page is calculated for the current moment and states which side is ahead. The gap changes during the year, because the two places usually start and end daylight saving on different dates.
- Is this difference the same all year?
- Not necessarily. Alajuela uses America/Costa_Rica and Tokyo uses Asia/Tokyo; if either observes daylight saving, the gap shifts during the year. Use “Convert a specific date and time” below to calculate it for a given day.
- How do I read the conversion table?
- The left column lists each whole hour in Alajuela; the right column is the local time in Tokyo at that same instant, with date rollovers marked. On the day clocks jump forward, some hours do not exist locally — the table says so instead of showing a plausible but wrong value.