Time difference between Ath Thawrah and Taipei
Taipei is 5 hours ahead of Ath Thawrah.
Local time in both cities
Ath Thawrah · Syria
20:38
SyriaTaipei · China
01:38
ChinaTaipei is 5 hours ahead of Ath Thawrah.
already the next day
Time zones
| Ath Thawrah | Asia/Damascus · UTC+03:00 |
|---|---|
| Taipei | Asia/Taipei · UTC+08:00 |
Ath Thawrah does not observe daylight saving and stays on UTC+03:00 all year.
Taipei does not observe daylight saving and stays on UTC+08:00 all year.
Hour-by-hour conversion
Calculated for 2026-09-21 local time in Ath Thawrah. The two places start and end daylight saving on different dates, so another day can give a different result.
| Ath Thawrah (source) | Taipei (target) |
|---|---|
| 00:00 | 05:00 |
| 01:00 | 06:00 |
| 02:00 | 07:00 |
| 03:00 | 08:00 |
| 04:00 | 09:00 |
| 05:00 | 10:00 |
| 06:00 | 11:00 |
| 07:00 | 12:00 |
| 08:00 | 13:00 |
| 09:00 | 14:00 |
| 10:00 | 15:00 |
| 11:00 | 16:00 |
| 12:00 | 17:00 |
| 13:00 | 18:00 |
| 14:00 | 19:00 |
| 15:00 | 20:00 |
| 16:00 | 21:00 |
| 17:00 | 22:00 |
| 18:00 | 23:00 |
| 19:00 | 00:00 next day |
| 20:00 | 01:00 next day |
| 21:00 | 02:00 next day |
| 22:00 | 03:00 next day |
| 23:00 | 04:00 next day |
Other common differences from Ath Thawrah
FAQ
- How many hours apart are Ath Thawrah and Taipei right now?
- The answer at the top of the page is calculated for the current moment and states which side is ahead. The gap changes during the year, because the two places usually start and end daylight saving on different dates.
- Is this difference the same all year?
- Not necessarily. Ath Thawrah uses Asia/Damascus and Taipei uses Asia/Taipei; if either observes daylight saving, the gap shifts during the year. Use “Convert a specific date and time” below to calculate it for a given day.
- How do I read the conversion table?
- The left column lists each whole hour in Ath Thawrah; the right column is the local time in Taipei at that same instant, with date rollovers marked. On the day clocks jump forward, some hours do not exist locally — the table says so instead of showing a plausible but wrong value.