Time difference between Beijing and Wādī as Sīr
Wādī as Sīr is 5 hours behind Beijing.
Local time in both cities
Beijing · China
03:40
ChinaWādī as Sīr · Jordan
22:40
JordanWādī as Sīr is 5 hours behind Beijing.
still the previous day
Time zones
| Beijing | Asia/Shanghai · UTC+08:00 |
|---|---|
| Wādī as Sīr | Asia/Amman · UTC+03:00 |
Beijing does not observe daylight saving and stays on UTC+08:00 all year.
Wādī as Sīr does not observe daylight saving and stays on UTC+03:00 all year.
Hour-by-hour conversion
Calculated for 2026-09-22 local time in Beijing. The two places start and end daylight saving on different dates, so another day can give a different result.
| Beijing (source) | Wādī as Sīr (target) |
|---|---|
| 00:00 | 19:00 prev day |
| 01:00 | 20:00 prev day |
| 02:00 | 21:00 prev day |
| 03:00 | 22:00 prev day |
| 04:00 | 23:00 prev day |
| 05:00 | 00:00 |
| 06:00 | 01:00 |
| 07:00 | 02:00 |
| 08:00 | 03:00 |
| 09:00 | 04:00 |
| 10:00 | 05:00 |
| 11:00 | 06:00 |
| 12:00 | 07:00 |
| 13:00 | 08:00 |
| 14:00 | 09:00 |
| 15:00 | 10:00 |
| 16:00 | 11:00 |
| 17:00 | 12:00 |
| 18:00 | 13:00 |
| 19:00 | 14:00 |
| 20:00 | 15:00 |
| 21:00 | 16:00 |
| 22:00 | 17:00 |
| 23:00 | 18:00 |
Other common differences from Beijing
FAQ
- How many hours apart are Beijing and Wādī as Sīr right now?
- The answer at the top of the page is calculated for the current moment and states which side is ahead. The gap changes during the year, because the two places usually start and end daylight saving on different dates.
- Is this difference the same all year?
- Not necessarily. Beijing uses Asia/Shanghai and Wādī as Sīr uses Asia/Amman; if either observes daylight saving, the gap shifts during the year. Use “Convert a specific date and time” below to calculate it for a given day.
- How do I read the conversion table?
- The left column lists each whole hour in Beijing; the right column is the local time in Wādī as Sīr at that same instant, with date rollovers marked. On the day clocks jump forward, some hours do not exist locally — the table says so instead of showing a plausible but wrong value.