Time difference between Tokyo and Umm el Faḥm
Umm el Faḥm is 6 hours behind Tokyo.
Local time in both cities
Tokyo · Japan
04:24
JapanUmm el Faḥm · Israel
22:24
IsraelUmm el Faḥm is 6 hours behind Tokyo.
still the previous day
Time zones
| Tokyo | Asia/Tokyo · UTC+09:00 |
|---|---|
| Umm el Faḥm | Asia/Jerusalem · UTC+03:00 |
Tokyo does not observe daylight saving and stays on UTC+09:00 all year.
Umm el Faḥm is currently on daylight saving time (UTC+03:00). Next change: 2026-10-25 01:00.
Hour-by-hour conversion
Calculated for 2026-09-22 local time in Tokyo. The two places start and end daylight saving on different dates, so another day can give a different result.
| Tokyo (source) | Umm el Faḥm (target) |
|---|---|
| 00:00 | 18:00 prev day |
| 01:00 | 19:00 prev day |
| 02:00 | 20:00 prev day |
| 03:00 | 21:00 prev day |
| 04:00 | 22:00 prev day |
| 05:00 | 23:00 prev day |
| 06:00 | 00:00 |
| 07:00 | 01:00 |
| 08:00 | 02:00 |
| 09:00 | 03:00 |
| 10:00 | 04:00 |
| 11:00 | 05:00 |
| 12:00 | 06:00 |
| 13:00 | 07:00 |
| 14:00 | 08:00 |
| 15:00 | 09:00 |
| 16:00 | 10:00 |
| 17:00 | 11:00 |
| 18:00 | 12:00 |
| 19:00 | 13:00 |
| 20:00 | 14:00 |
| 21:00 | 15:00 |
| 22:00 | 16:00 |
| 23:00 | 17:00 |
Other common differences from Tokyo
FAQ
- How many hours apart are Tokyo and Umm el Faḥm right now?
- The answer at the top of the page is calculated for the current moment and states which side is ahead. The gap changes during the year, because the two places usually start and end daylight saving on different dates.
- Is this difference the same all year?
- Not necessarily. Tokyo uses Asia/Tokyo and Umm el Faḥm uses Asia/Jerusalem; if either observes daylight saving, the gap shifts during the year. Use “Convert a specific date and time” below to calculate it for a given day.
- How do I read the conversion table?
- The left column lists each whole hour in Tokyo; the right column is the local time in Umm el Faḥm at that same instant, with date rollovers marked. On the day clocks jump forward, some hours do not exist locally — the table says so instead of showing a plausible but wrong value.